1 How can steel and concrete buildings fall at free fall speed, by fire and gravity alone?
Answer: No way. It is physically impossible for a reinforced structure of concrete and steel to collapse at almost free fall speed, upon its footprint without explosives, because concrete and steel naturally offer much more resistance than air to a falling object, unless systematically blown out of the way, as it happens in a control demolition.
I now this fact is hard for us to come to terms with. It was not easy for me to face the facts either. So without any desire to be offensive, let me ask you a simple question: How do we know there were no explosives used in the buildings?
Neither FEMA nor NIST even tested for explosives. The steel remains were quickly destroyed so that no conclusive examination of the evidence can settled this question.
Think about that. Never in history a building had collapsed due to fire. Symetrical collapses of buildings at free fall speed can only occur as a result of control demolition. A perfectly natural hypothesis; Yet, No examination testing for explosive, and the destruction of the evidence so that now there is no evidence to examine in the worst crime in recent times. Who did that?
Government officials did. The same who told us the official story. Now people think they know the truth, purely by faith in the word of the government without evidence. Because one dare not think the unthinkable, That some government officials may have conspired to commit and cover up a henious crime.
You may ask what evidence leads me to prefer the explanation of a controlled demolition to explain the fall, I would point to the following:
The speed of the fall,
The symetry of the fall,
the complete destruction of the structure,
the explosive trajectory of some of the debris
molten metal at the foundation of each demolished building,
evidence of thermite
eye witness reports of demolition type explosions in both towers.
the fact that no other building has collapsed as a result of fire.
For a scholarly presentation of these and other considerations:
see here:
Updated Version: Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?
The official story provides no reasonable answer to the most basic questions.
The families of the victims still have valid unanswered questions. Had it not been for their persistence, we would know even less than we do. Consider what they have to say watching their documentary:
Press for Truth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481&q=Press+for+truth
I have no theory to advance, just an assertion of fact: the official story does not square with the known facts. And any non biased investigator is able to verified that. That is the purpose of my questions and this post to invite you gentle reader to examine the fact by yourself.
Look at the evidence. Face the facts. Ask questions; America needs to wake up and face the facts.
9/11 mysteries
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries
“But he has nothing on at all,” said a little child at last. . . . and one whispered to the other what the child had said. “But he has nothing on at all,” cried at last the whole people. That made a deep impression upon the emperor, for it seemed to him that they were right; but he thought to himself, “Now I must bear up to the end.” And the chamberlains walked with still greater dignity, as if they carried the train which did not exist.
Saturday, September 30, 2006
9/11 Ask Questions
I invite you to consider the facts, and ask the basic questions: For example
1 How can steel and concrete buildings fall at free fall speed, by fire and gravity alone?
2 What happened to the 47 massive core columns of the towers?
3 How can asymmetric damage cause symmetric controlled demolition like collapses in three buildings the same day?
4 What caused the collapse of the WT7 in a symmetrical demolition like manner? How and why?
5 Why four hijacked planes were not intercepted by the most sophisticated defense system in the planet? Why was nobody held accountable for such blatant failures?
6 Why was the pentagon hit in the most difficult angle at the least efficient place?
7 Why the government resisted every effort of serious investigation? Why the families of the victims were forced to demand an investigation from the government, without which there would not have been an official investigation?
8 Why the official investigation report left unanswered the most important questions, and is plagued with omissions and distortions?
9 Why the evidence was quickly removed and destroyed?
10 Where did the molten metal at the foundation of the three buildings come from?
11 Where does the energy to melt metal came from?
12 Why most of the eye witness of the collapse, many of them experienced firemen, testified perceiving controlled demolition like explosions inside of the buildings?
13 Why president Bush stayed put reading a book to kids knowing the nation was under attack?
14 Why was he not protected by the secret service?
And there are many other basic unanswered questions, omissions and distortions showing that your faith in the official story is not based upon and objective examination of the facts but upon an apriori faith in the government and the rejection of the possibility that the official story could be false.
We were all deceived by a well constructed lie. The only way you will find out this is so, is if you step out of the ideological bubble and begin to cross check the official story against the facts.
You may begin here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481&q=press+for+truth
Forget about conspiracy theories. Face the facts. Make questions. Start dialogue. The truth shall make us free.
1 How can steel and concrete buildings fall at free fall speed, by fire and gravity alone?
2 What happened to the 47 massive core columns of the towers?
3 How can asymmetric damage cause symmetric controlled demolition like collapses in three buildings the same day?
4 What caused the collapse of the WT7 in a symmetrical demolition like manner? How and why?
5 Why four hijacked planes were not intercepted by the most sophisticated defense system in the planet? Why was nobody held accountable for such blatant failures?
6 Why was the pentagon hit in the most difficult angle at the least efficient place?
7 Why the government resisted every effort of serious investigation? Why the families of the victims were forced to demand an investigation from the government, without which there would not have been an official investigation?
8 Why the official investigation report left unanswered the most important questions, and is plagued with omissions and distortions?
9 Why the evidence was quickly removed and destroyed?
10 Where did the molten metal at the foundation of the three buildings come from?
11 Where does the energy to melt metal came from?
12 Why most of the eye witness of the collapse, many of them experienced firemen, testified perceiving controlled demolition like explosions inside of the buildings?
13 Why president Bush stayed put reading a book to kids knowing the nation was under attack?
14 Why was he not protected by the secret service?
And there are many other basic unanswered questions, omissions and distortions showing that your faith in the official story is not based upon and objective examination of the facts but upon an apriori faith in the government and the rejection of the possibility that the official story could be false.
We were all deceived by a well constructed lie. The only way you will find out this is so, is if you step out of the ideological bubble and begin to cross check the official story against the facts.
You may begin here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481&q=press+for+truth
Forget about conspiracy theories. Face the facts. Make questions. Start dialogue. The truth shall make us free.
CHOMSKY FEARS 9/11 DEBATE
When questioned about his stance on the 9/11 issue, Chomsky supports the official line with apriori arguments. The official version is "pretty much what happened" according to him. He claims that he hasn't seen any "credible evidence" to suggest otherwise. But Chomsky does not address the scholarly evidence of 9/11 omissions and distortions. Why?
Whatever the reason we should be very careful with anyone asking you to make your mind about 9/11 without considering the facts. If you hear apriori arguments and adhominem arguments instead of an invitation to consider all the relevants facts you can be sure you are encountering disinformation.
read more | digg story
Whatever the reason we should be very careful with anyone asking you to make your mind about 9/11 without considering the facts. If you hear apriori arguments and adhominem arguments instead of an invitation to consider all the relevants facts you can be sure you are encountering disinformation.
read more | digg story
Monday, September 25, 2006
Crisis is upon us.
Chavez warned the world. Bush is evil. Americans need to wake up, and oppose the imperial evil and madness leading this country into a war for world domination. WWIII. This is the only time when raising the voice of alarm will have any effect. After the nuclear weapons are used against Iran, we will have nothing to do but suffer the consequences of our current indolence. The Crisis is upon us. God have mercy.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
9/11 and Media Crimes
There is a 9/11 cover up occurring. It appears to be intentional. When the truth about 9/11 comes out, that it was an inside job involving members of the Bush Administration, there will be a massive international investigation. The media that helped with this cover up will be held accountable, if there is any hope for the future of democracy.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Why "NOT" to Fight for 9/11 Truth
"Propaganda is not meant to fool the intelligencia
. . . but to provide them an excuse."
-- Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propagandist
read more | digg story
. . . but to provide them an excuse."
-- Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propagandist
read more | digg story
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
No Theory Just Facts: 9/11 Healthy Cognitive Dissonance
Fact: The Towers fell at free fall speed.
Fact: The official story requires us to believe that two reinforced concrete and steel structures were pulverized in mid air by gravity alone at the speed that it takes a billiard ball to fall from the top of the building to the ground.
Without powerful explosives, this is simply impossible.
Learn the truth: 911 research
Read the following article: "After 5 years, we still don't know what really happened on 9/11. This pathetic state of affairs should not continue. We have an elementary right to receive full answers to these basic questions. I don't have ready-made answers. I just offer you the raw data to start a healthy process of cognitive dissonance, with which you can do as you please."
read more | digg story
Fact: The official story requires us to believe that two reinforced concrete and steel structures were pulverized in mid air by gravity alone at the speed that it takes a billiard ball to fall from the top of the building to the ground.
Without powerful explosives, this is simply impossible.
Learn the truth: 911 research
Read the following article: "After 5 years, we still don't know what really happened on 9/11. This pathetic state of affairs should not continue. We have an elementary right to receive full answers to these basic questions. I don't have ready-made answers. I just offer you the raw data to start a healthy process of cognitive dissonance, with which you can do as you please."
read more | digg story
Monday, September 11, 2006
9-11 Press for Truth:
'Knowledge is power', the father of one of the victims of 9/11 recalls with tears at the end of this documentary. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is a compilation of reported facts, unheeded by the majority; a message all need but most have not heard. Five years after 9/11 it is time for us to pay attention to what the families have to say.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
9-11 Press for Truth:
'Knowledge is power', the father of one of the victims of 9/11 recalls with tears at the end of this documentary. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is a compilation of reported facts, unheeded by the majority; a message all need but most have not heard. Five years after 9/11 it is time for us to pay attention to what the families have to say.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Is American Democracy Too Feeble To Deal With 9/11?
"Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates. The violent destruction of life and property incident to war, the continual effort and alarm attendant on a state of continual danger, will compel nations the most attached to liberty to
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Is American Democracy Too Feeble To Deal With 9/11?
"Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates. The violent destruction of life and property incident to war, the continual effort and alarm attendant on a state of continual danger, will compel nations the most attached to liberty to
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Saturday, September 09, 2006
BYU Places '9/11 Truth' Professor on Paid Leave
The arguments of Prof Jones are solid. No one should make an opinion of them before reading the article. He points out objective facts which radically undermine the credibility of the official story. You need to examine these objectively before reacting. Here is a link to the >
professor’s article,
Read It. And see the quality of the evidence for yourself. If he is so wrong it should not be hard to find a valid refutation to his claims. So far I have only found ad-hominem attacks and forgone conclusions; no solid refutation, from anyone. So, as far as I can tell, the good prof. is right and is being persecuted for showing that the emperor has no clothes.
read more | digg story
professor’s article,
Read It. And see the quality of the evidence for yourself. If he is so wrong it should not be hard to find a valid refutation to his claims. So far I have only found ad-hominem attacks and forgone conclusions; no solid refutation, from anyone. So, as far as I can tell, the good prof. is right and is being persecuted for showing that the emperor has no clothes.
read more | digg story
A Critical Review of Morgan Reynolds' Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers
His article weds the thesis of controlled demolition of the skyscrapers with the denial that Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 crashed where reported. This is unfortunate because it functions to discredit the case for demolition by associating it with ideas that lack scientific merit, are easily debunked, and are inherently offensive to the victims.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers' Collapse? by Morgan Reynolds
It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely prove to be sound.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
The Fatal Flaw of the Official 9-11 Story
It is a fraud. The concrete floors must provide more resistance to debris than air. But the towers fell near free fall speed. If the government wrote a bunch of papers saying "the earth was flat" and went on the air saying that anyone who disagreed was a terrorist or a "conspiracy theorist", would that make you believe that the world is flat
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Friday, September 01, 2006
The Video Every American Needs to See.
Did you now that the government is asking us to believe that a miracle happened on 9/11?
Facts, The towers fell at free fall speed. The Lower levels offered no more resistance to the debri falling than air. Think about: Concrete, vs air, which one should present more resistance. Concrete? Yes! You win, but on 9/11 concrete and steel frame acted like air!
There is much more that you need to consider. So do yourself a favor, go to this website and see this video. You will never see those towers falling in the same way again!
http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
After you have seen it, tell all your friends. Time to wake up and call for accountability.
read more | digg story
Facts, The towers fell at free fall speed. The Lower levels offered no more resistance to the debri falling than air. Think about: Concrete, vs air, which one should present more resistance. Concrete? Yes! You win, but on 9/11 concrete and steel frame acted like air!
There is much more that you need to consider. So do yourself a favor, go to this website and see this video. You will never see those towers falling in the same way again!
http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
After you have seen it, tell all your friends. Time to wake up and call for accountability.
read more | digg story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)