Not just natural milk fans, but all who seek private food arrangements will appreciate Raw Milk Revolution. The number of cases discussed and his close look at the scientific arguments provide solid ground for defending the right to make our own food choices. He also reveals just how far CorpoGov will go in shutting down all competition to industrial food. The book is indispensable for anyone writing about the food wars: key arguments, cases, people, and organizations are listed in the expansive index for easy reference.
Gumpert closes his book with a warning:
If secretive government regulators are successful in their efforts to deprive consumers of unpasteurized dairy products, they will be emboldened to push us farther toward their vision of reliance on sterile factory food.
Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts
Is the FDA’s war on milk part of US strategy to ban all private food contracts?
by Rady Ananda,Activist Post
http://www.activistpost.com/2010/10/criminalizing-natures-most-perfect-food.html
Pilot to TSA: 'No Groping Me and No Naked Photos' by Michael Roberts: "The TSA investigator arrived and asked for my account of the situation. I explained that the agents weren’t allowing me to pass through the checkpoint. He told me he had been advised that I was refusing security screening, to which I replied that I had willingly walked through the metal detector with no alarms, the same way I always do when commuting to work. He then briefed me on the recent screening policy changes and, apparently confused, asked whether they would be a problem for me. I stated that I did indeed have a problem with the infringement of my civil rights and liberty.
His reply: 'That’s irrelevant.'
It wasn’t irrelevant to me."It is relevant to me also.
More than eight years after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, New York Supreme Court Justice Edward H. Lehner was hearing arguments in a courtroom less than a mile from Ground Zero about a ballot initiative to launch a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks. When the lawyer for the plaintiffs sponsoring the initiative explained that the 9/11 Commission report left many unanswered questions, including “Why did Building 7 come down,” the Judge replied quizzically, “Building what?”
Like Judge Lehner, millions of people do not know or remember only vaguely that a third tower called World Trade Center Building 7 also collapsed on September 11, 2001. In any other situation, the complete, free fall collapse of a 47-story skyscraper would be played over and over on the news. It would be discussed for years to come and building design codes would be completely rewritten. So, why does no one know about Building 7? And why did Building 7 come down?
The answers to these questions have far-reaching implications for our society. The goal of the “BuildingWhat?” campaign is to raise awareness of Building 7 so that together we can begin to address these questions.http://buildingwhat.org/
We need to become aware of their tricks so that they cannot play us into compliance any more.
"In our dreams people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands"
Frederick Gates Chairman of the Rockefeller General Education Board "1912, The Worlds Work"
"In our dreams people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands"
Frederick Gates Chairman of the Rockefeller General Education Board "1912, The Worlds Work"
"individualism is one of the biggest obstacles in the way of the New World Order" They want a public that is predictable and conditioned to as it's told without asking questions.
They coined the word politically correct 50 years before the west caught on.
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George OrwellThere was a time when the pen was mightier than the sword. That was a time when people believed in truth and regarded truth as an independent power and not as an auxiliary for government, class, race, ideological, personal, or financial interest."
G. Edward Griffins: "The major tax exempt foundations of this land, since at least 1945, have been opperating to promote a hidden agenda. That agenda has nothing to do with the surface apperance of charity good works or philantropy.
The real objective include the creation of a world wide collectivist state, including the soviet Union, which is to be ruled from behind the scenes by those same interest which now control the tax exempt foundations."
Norman Dodd, 7:30 min: "We will never see sound banking in the United States again....
Since the end of World War I, we have been responsible for the "institutionalizing of conflicting interest" and it is so prevalent inside this country that it shall never be resolved. "
Hidden Agenda Norman Dodd 3 of 6
..."The next thing was to educate them as to the effect on the country as a whole of the activities of the large endowed foundations over the then [1953] past 40 years....That effect was to orient our educational system away from support of the principles embodied in the declaration of independence and implemented in the constitution; an educate them over to the idea that the task now was, as a result of the orientation of education away from these briefly stated principles and self-evident truths.
That is what had been the effect of the wealth which constituted the endowments of those foundations which have been in existence over the largest portion of the span of fifty years; Holding them responsible for this change.
What we uncovered was a determination of this large endowed foundations through their trustees to actually get control over the content of American Education."
Carnagiee minutes of 1908:
"In that Year, the trustees meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throught the balance of the year, in a very learned fashion. And the question is: Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people. They conclude that: no more effective means than war, to that end, is known to humanity.
So then in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it: How do we involve the United States in a war?
...
Finally they answered that question as follows: We must control the State Department. ...
How do we do that?...
They answered by saying: 'we must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.' And finally they resolved to aim at that as an objective.
...
At that time [WWI] they record on their minutes a choking report in which they dispatched to president Wilson a telegram cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.
Finally... the war is over, at that time their interest shift over to preventing what they called a "reversion of life in the US to what it was prior to 1914, when wwi broke out, and they come to the conclusion that to prevent a reversion we must control education in the United states.
They realized that this is a pretty big task.
It is too big for them alone, so they approached the Rockefeller foundation, with the suggestion that that portion of education which could be considered domestic be handled by the Rockefeller foundation, and that portion which is international should be handled by the endowment.
They then decide that the key to the success of these two oppeartions lay in the alteration of the teaching of American history. So they approached four of the then most prominent teachers of American History in the country, People like... "
"I don't know if I could call it [homosexual conduct] un-natural, because animals do it"Ben: Some clarification is necessary here.
"Saying it affects anyone's natural rights other than the people involved is a far stretch that I can not agree with. As long as it is between consenting adults, and behind closed doors, it does not affect me or anyone else. The argument that society would become extinct after one generation does not work either (I have tremendous respect for your opinions, Ben) because each couple's decisions would only affect their own posterity. To make this argument, you would almost have to argue that the government could require me to have children against my will - for the sake of society and future generations."
Conspiracy of Silence:
55:56 - Minutes
In 1993 a team from Yorkshire Television came to Omaha, Nebraska to document, investigate, and un-cover the mysteries surrounding the Franklin case and the ensuing cover-up. What the team would find through the course of their near year long investigation would ultimately reach to the White House itself, where they found that then Vice-President George H.W. Bush had been implicated in the crimes surrounding the case. The explosive documentary was scheduled to air in 1994 on the Discovery Channel. At the last minute the program was pulled from the airwaves, and to this day has never made to television screens. See the documentary certain interests didn't want you to see."
"It all gets really simple when we realize that the free choices of individuals (ie, sexual orientation) that do not interfere with the natural rights of others is really no issue at all in a truly free society."Homosexual conduct does interfere with the natural rights of others. Consider a society where homosexual conduct would become the norm. That society would be set to extinction within a generation. It is for such obvious reasons that within traditional Christian ethics (on top of the teaching of the Bible) homosexual conduct has been identified as "unnatural".
"Government involvement in social and culture wars is nothing short of tyranny. For example, marriage is an institution of religion, but government has claimed it and given it special dispensations… therefore, what would otherwise be comical and absurd insensitivity by homosexuals to those of faith who define marriage as between a man and a woman, gay marriage has become a “rights” issue."Marriage, like the family, are religious institutions with serious consequences for society. A government which in its policies undermines these institutions, at the same time undermines the right to life, liberty and property of its present and future generations.
The Great Conspiracy Exposed: Retired FBI "Honcho" Ted Gunderson goes all out in this video and with sincere patriotic fervor explains the cancerous infestation of organized felony crime that has infiltrated the United States government at the local, State and Federal levels. He explains the continuing crime and corruption being carried on under color of law by the Illuminati, the crooked FBI, the murderous CIA and other out-of-control agencies of the federal government. Ted warns that unless Americans "wake up" and take individual action to demand that the gangsters in government be arrested and prosecuted---then, God help us all because we are soon to witness the complete ruination of America and our people who will be ruled by the "iron rod" of a Fascistoid Police State. This is not a theory; it is the hard truth! http://www.1-free-dvd.com http://www.tedgunderson.com http://thesenatorhillary.blogspot.com
Way to Prevent Illness Without Supplements or Drugs?
by Joseph Mercola "I think we're opening up," Dossey says. "I'm sure you remember, about 40 years ago when meditation burst upon the scene in medicine, it was put down. It was called California Woo woo. Nobody wanted to have anything to do with it. But now nobody raises an eye about meditation and yoga, even in medicine.We're in the same place with spirituality that we were with meditation about 20 years ago. People know you can't ignore it. The correlation between spiritual practice and health outcomes is just too strong.For example, the data shows that people who follow some sort of spiritual path in their life… live on average seven to 13 years longer than people who do not follow a spiritual practice."
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist (Documentary) - 1The corbettreport.com will be figuring high on my list of relevant sources.
Napolitano: "Assaults by fanatics on our safety, do not justify assaults by the government on our freedom. ...
Ask your member of Congress whoever she or he may be, where in the Constitution is it authorized for the Federal government to regulate health care. They will not be able to answer that question. ...
These gatherings are more important than anything you can imagine. Because in the long history of the world only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its maximun hour of danger. You are that generation! This is your role! Now is that time!
Freedom must be defended from every assailant in every corner of this country, from outside the country, from inside the country and especially from the government that wants to take it away from us."Judge Andrew Napolitano Natural Rights and PATRIOT ACT Part 2 of 3
"Goverment at times tells you lies. The deception is historic and continuous.
Does the government want you to know that it has killed innocent civilians in Afganistan? Of Course Not!
Does it want you to know that it has dispatched hit squads to kill civilians in Afganistan that it hates and fears in violation of American Law, Afgan Law and International Law? Of course not! ...
The Government needs to be exposed because it cannot be trusted to expose itself.
The light of day and the light of truth are the best disinfectants for the government no matter what it does. ...
Something is not right when people must break the law and risk their freedom to tell us the truth.
Thank God for the Truth! No matther how it comes to us." Judge Andrew Napolitano:
Unnecessary lies: A whistleblower's perspective on; Necessary Secrets: "
Gabriel Schoenfeld, in his recent book, fails to mention that some government secrets hide illegal government activity.
by Jesselyn Radack, August 9, 2010
Secrecy is a cornerstone of autocratic rule and unaccountable political systems, not democracies. ...
So, why are Schoenfeld's arguments so palatable? In masterful sophistry, Schoenfeld uses reverse psychology: The New York Times failed to "exercise responsibility" and "broke the public trust" by exposing electronic eavesdropping, not the Bush administration or NSA by engaging in it. Whistleblowers like Thomas Tamm violated their oath of secrecy by disclosing the scandal, not the government by violating its oath to uphold the Constitution. Although he characterizes the Watergate and the Iran-Contra affairs as "renegade governmental activity," secret surveillance (a close cousin to the illegality that underpinned Watergate) gets a pass because in some über-paternalistic way it is meant to protect us — and anyone who tries to bring forth information that would allow the public to exercise its sovereign prerogative of democratic debate be damned, or better yet, sent to prison. Isn't incarceration the ultimate way to stifle public debate by cutting off alternative information at the source? ...
In support of Schoenfeld's novel prosecutorial theory, he trots out many of the old arguments that have been debunked. For example, he states that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was too "cumbersome." He also dredges up the tired excuse that "advances in telecommunications technology during the two and half decades since FISA was enacted render[ed] it unsuitable" and "[r]equiring a court order to intercept [e-mail] communications was a preposterous barrier to U.S. intelligence gathering." All of this is belied by the fact that FISA was massively expanded in October 2001, at the Bush administration's request, to (in the president's own words) "allow surveillance of all communications used by terrorists, including e-mails, the Internet, and cell phones." After assuring the country that he had all the surveillance tools he needed, Bush proceeded the same month with his secret spying regime. ...
all three federal judges to consider the question have concluded that Bush's NSA program violated criminal law (something Schoenfeld neglects to mention). The clear criminality of the NSA program is further amplified by Schoenfeld's glaring omission of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 — referenced not once in his entire book — which immunized telecommunications companies, terminated all pending lawsuits against them and legalized warrantless wiretapping. It raises the question of why such legislation was necessary, especially the retroactive telecom-immunity provisions, if no law had been broken. ...
Overly broad, ambiguous laws have an irresistible quality, and now — ignoring the president's own edict to "look forward, not backward" — the Obama administration, through its marching orders to Attorney General Eric Holder Jr., has literally taken a page from Schoenfeld's book by forcing a trial for espionage on a person who is not a spy: Thomas Drake. Unfortunately, the Espionage Act does not distinguish between spying and "leaking." A hurdle in the Drake prosecution will be demonstrating to a jury that he had the requisite state of mind that is a crucial element of the crime. Specifically, did he have "reason to believe" that his disclosure — if he made one at all — "could be used to the injury of the United States"? There is more than a reasonable doubt that Drake had any such state of mind. When Drake went to a reporter, it was only after his internal complaints fell on the deaf ears of his bosses, the NSA's general counsel and inspector general, the Defense Department's inspector general and the House and Senate intelligence committees. His disclosures were a matter of public concern and were clearly of public significance: The NSA went on a "billion dollar boondoggle" and ultimately chose an extremely intrusive surveillance program over an even better program that protected privacy. ...
The old adage goes, "it's not the crime, but the cover-up" that will ultimately get bad actors. Under this calculus, at least malfeasors are held accountable at some point. But Schoenfeld's version appears to be "it's not the crime — ever — but the exposure of it" that will be penalized. I submit that when secrecy is used to cloak illegal conduct, that is what should be punished.
Jesselyn Radack is the homeland security director at the Government Accountability Project. As an ethics adviser to the Department of Justice, she blew the whistle on the FBI's interrogation of "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh without an attorney present.Read the whole article here
Targeting Iran: Is the US Administration Planning a Nuclear Holocaust?: by Michel Chossudovsky
"'We have discovered the most terrible bomb in the history of the world. It may be the fire destruction prophesied in the Euphrates Valley Era, after Noah and his fabulous Ark.... This weapon is to be used against Japan ... [We] will use it so that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target and not women and children. Even if the Japs are savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop that terrible bomb on the old capital or the new. ... The target will be a purely military one... It seems to be the most terrible thing ever discovered, but it can be made the most useful.'
(President Harry S. Truman, Diary, July 25, 1945)
'The World will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians..' (President Harry S. Truman in a radio speech to the Nation, August 9, 1945).
[Note: the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945; the Second on Nagasaki, on August 9, on the same day as Truman's radio speech to the Nation]
(Listen to Excerpt of his speech, Hiroshima audio video)"
The Lies Of Hiroshima Are The Lies Of Today.: by John Pilger
"In the immediate aftermath of the bomb, the allied occupation authorities banned all mention of radiation poisoning and insisted that people had been killed or injured only by the bomb's blast. It was the first big lie. 'No radioactivity in Hiroshima ruin' said the front page of the New York Times, a classic of disinformation and journalistic abdication, which the Australian reporter Wilfred Burchett put right with his scoop of the century. 'I write this as a warning to the world,' reported Burchett in the Daily Express, having reached Hiroshima after a perilous journey, the first correspondent to dare. He described hospital wards filled with people with no visible injuries but who were dying from what he called 'an atomic plague'. For telling this truth, his press accreditation was withdrawn, he was pilloried and smeared - and vindicated."
The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a criminal act on an epic scale. It was premeditated mass murder that unleashed a weapon of intrinsic criminality. For this reason its apologists have sought refuge in the mythology of the ultimate "good war", whose "ethical bath", as Richard Drayton called it, has allowed the west not only to expiate its bloody imperial past but to promote 60 years of rapacious war, always beneath the shadow of The Bomb.
The most enduring lie is that the atomic bomb was dropped to end the war in the Pacific and save lives. "Even without the atomic bombing attacks," concluded the United States Strategic Bombing Survey of 1946, "air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion. Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that ... Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."
The National Archives in Washington contain US government documents that chart Japanese peace overtures as early as 1943. None was pursued. A cable sent on May 5, 1945 by the German ambassador in Tokyo and intercepted by the US dispels any doubt that the Japanese were desperate to sue for peace, including "capitulation even if the terms were hard". Instead, the US secretary of war, Henry Stimson, told President Truman he was "fearful" that the US air force would have Japan so "bombed out" that the new weapon would not be able "to show its strength". He later admitted that "no effort was made, and none was seriously considered, to achieve surrender merely in order not to have to use the bomb". His foreign policy colleagues were eager "to browbeat the Russians with the bomb held rather ostentatiously on our hip". General Leslie Groves, director of the Manhattan Project that made the bomb, testified: "There was never any illusion on my part that Russia was our enemy, and that the project was conducted on that basis." The day after Hiroshima was obliterated, President Truman voiced his satisfaction with the "overwhelming success" of "the experiment"....
The question begs: are the rest of us to be mere bystanders, claiming, as good Germans did, that "we did not know"? Do we hide ever more behind what Richard Falk has called "a self-righteous, one-way, legal/moral screen [with] positive images of western values and innocence portrayed as threatened, validating a campaign of unrestricted violence"? Catching war criminals is fashionable again. Radovan Karadzic stands in the dock, but Sharon and Olmert, Bush and Blair do not. Why not? The memory of Hiroshima requires an answer.
A television crew from Ireland's Radio Telifís Éireann happened to be recording a documentary about Chávez during the events of April 11, 2002. Shifting focus, they followed the events as they occurred. During their filming, the crew recorded images of the events that they say contradict explanations given by Chávez opposition, the private media, the US State Department, and then White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer. The documentary says that the coup was the result of a conspiracy between various old guard and anti-Chávez factions within Venezuela and the United States.
"This is volcanic in nature"
The 'disaster' in the Gulf of Mexico is beyond a false flag; it's an illusion. What I'm about to reveal will more than likely go by the wayside, and the charade will continue. The reason for writing this is not for attention, games, or folly, but to expose the biggest scam in the 21st century, and to relieve some aching hearts. There is no need for fear as this is a staged event. I cannot reveal my sources, they do go straight to the top, but hopefully what I write will echo inside of each person reading this as the truth.
Much of the information I present here cannot be easily verified, fast checked, or ever presented as anything, but hearsay, as they are just words of an anonymous online entity. The Government, corporations, and the people behind them have pulled out all the stops to insure the truth doesn't come out. They are the reason why the beaches have private security contractors, insuring no one is able to gain access to the oil on shore. They are the reason the Gulf of Mexico is a no fly zone. They are the reason why the gulf states are being locked down by military. They are the reason why the well head you see is different in many videos that BP releases. Without this measure of control the illusion would fail. In this post, what I can do is provide leading evidence, or give clues to the truth; from there you can use something that has gone by the way side, common sense.
The large oil spills washing up on the shores are not from BP Deep Horizon. They are indeed from surrounding wells, that were already leaking by design. These wells can be verified through a simple online search. You'll notice that much of the oil is actually in the form of tar. Usually tar balls; sizes of these have reached 2000+ pounds.
>From the start, BP, Haliburton, and co-conspirators knew where they were drilling. Using specific equipment, such as the German ship RV Sonne, they had detailed maps of the ocean bottom. The ship, and a specific college study from 2005, in the Gulf of Mexico, are your starting points to what's really happening in the gulf. Here's a link to what the study synopses http://geology.about.com/cs/volcanology/a/aa051604a.htm
What BP, Haliburton, and other co-conspirators intentionally drilled into was an Asphalt Volcano. Sounds scary doesn't it? It really is not. In fact, after you read the above link you'll know that the Gulf of Mexico is literally coated in oil, tar, and methane hydrate at the bottom. The study went on to find that massive aquatic life has specifically adapted to living off of the hydrocarbons. That in fact these asphalt volcanoes are a natural part of the ocean ecology, and their eruptions actually benefit the sea life over the long duration of time.
Another aspect to what I was directly told is that BP, Haliburton, and other co-conspirators drilled intentionally into the 'mid side' of this particular asphalt volcano. Basically from what I understand, it is a soda bottle effect. If they had drilled into the top of the volcano, then all the gas would rise out, and explode as would bottled carbonated liquid. The effect of drilling into the side permits a safely controlled release of gas, tar, liquified asphalt, and other related gases. What was done is a more or less controlled release; almost natural in fact!
The Asphalt volcano was a win win situation for this false flag: as it presented the best illusion to all outside parties. Not only do the conspirators need to fool the general public, but also the oil industry, and scientific community. The public is easy to fool, but the latter two groups take a little more effort; this is the main reason why the Gulf is being isolated by security contractors, and military. Anyone well versed on this giant debacle in the Gulf knows that it is surrounded with stories, and claims of negligence. This was the first purposeful aspect to make the story seem credible to all outside parties; as the story is more easily believed, when it is chalked up to human error, or incompetence.
Besides using inferior, shotty, or flat out negligent craftsmanship, as the well was intended to fail from the onset, the conspirators knew that the pressure produced from the volcano would blow out even better equipment. This was the second mechanism to fool other industry experts. All experts, and scientific communities only know what they are told, and that is the well tapped into a large high pressure hydrocarbon pocket. To even a trained eye, what they are being told appears to be a massive oil gusher, when in fact it's a controlled event.
In watching the videos, or live feeds looks horrible, and very ominous, but upon closer examination the tell tale signs of what it really is shows through, what you are actually viewing is a man made(well bore) large "Black Smoker". You should take note, as the evidence has built, the live feed appears to have been tampered with. I suspect it is because of the video below. The man narrating the video has it correct, it is a volcano! But those aren't flames. From the link provided above, they are a combination of gases; specifically Sulfur, and Iron are what create the flame effect. Since the airing of that video, several of the live feeds have been proven to be tampered footage, or faked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Den9CoYb0OHs
You need to realize that an illusion is only as good as it's weakest link. All scientific evidence on paper coming from the government, and corporations is being fudged. In the case of this staged, and controlled event that weak link is the oil, or more specifically the tangible tar that can be collected. As I mentioned much of the oil that has been seen, or noticed is tar rather than heavy crude oil. Out at sea closest to the Deep Horizon site, "shrimpers" have been hired to boom the oil/tar together, and set it ablaze. There are several huge fires right now out in the Gulf. The reason is for this is to hide the evidence. The distinct asphalt volcano tar, is actually coated with naturally produced oil eating microbes, and other natural safe guards produced by Mother Earth; these types of organisms are not present in a regular oil well, but commonly in the Asphalt Volcanoes, and large tar flows at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.
To continue with why the asphalt volcano was a win win to drill into, is the heaviness of the tar. Read the linked article provided above, the tar will cling to lighter oil, and fall to the bottom of the Gulf at some point, near in the future. Also, the microbes, and other organisms that naturally occur from this will multiply. They will not only eat the tar, but the other control released oil that they are pumping into the Gulf.
We've all seen the videos of beaches not lined so much with oil, but with tar balls of varying sizes. Also, we've all noticed BP's overall lack of concern for cleanup. We've seen booms which aren't tied together. We've heard first hand account of staged clean ups on the beaches. As soon as a press conference, or media event is done BP stops work. The reason is simple, it's not that they don't care, but that they already know what's gonna happen. The oil will start naturally being cleaned up via decomposition, oil eating organisms, and falling to the already naturally tar covered bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.
What's the benefit of this scam? MONEY, and population control. Read this article http://theintelhub.com/2010/06/18/gulf- ... ized-plan/ If you're still reading this article, and even beginning to grasp the sinister nature of the fraud being perpetrated, then you'll realize that the corexit9500, and other dispersant's are not needed. They are purposely being sprayed by Evergreen Air/CIA to cull the population along the Gulf Coast.
Also, explained to me, is the large amount of useless eaters, pond scum, or undesirables living along the gulf coast. These would be the Americans living off of the government. I will not beat around the bush with pleasantries, or politically correct statements here. This coastal area from Texas to Florida has the highest, or most dense population of targets of illimination by the US Govt., and corporations. These are the populations living on welfare(in this area dominated by African Americans), and the older population living on Social Security(mainly Florida). These people are going to start dropping like flies over the next few years, and greatly reduce the burden to government coffers.
In this respect this is a doomsday event, but it's not the end of the food chain, death of the oceans, or as some have warned an extinction level event. It's only bad for the targeted populations.
To cover the money aspects of this fraudulent event, are somewhat self evident. Primarily, as President Obama (note he's not very worried, think about it) has just pointed out, they are using this false flag to move forward with the Carbon Tax, followed by Cap, and Trade. Another aspect of profit is the clean up of this disaster; those boats aren't running around for free in the Gulf. From there, is the very real aspect of banks calling their notes on the remaining mortgaged properties along the Gulf, and peninsula of Florida. Remember Katrina? They never gave the land back, but sold it to casinos, and other businesses. Almost all beach front property will end up in the hands of the banks, and government. They'll play this disaster off for a few years, and explain the mysterious disappearance of oil on kindness from mother nature.
The side effects of this scam are negligible; in the eyes of the perpetrators, they've done nature a favor. They've opened up an asphalt volcano from the side, and will shut it down in the next few months by equalizing the pressure. The equalization of pressure will come by way of the two relief wells; which are not wells, but vents. when they do this, I have no clue what excuse they'll use, but the current gusher will stop. I said stop, it will not slow down, but literally stop. Remember, all they have done is aided nature in something that is a very common, and naturally occurring event at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.
That's about all I have to say. I will pop in to answer any if at all questions. The reason I came forward with this information is that I myself was worried about the level of this event. Honestly, knowing the reasoning of what, why, and how has given me peace. Anyone who has family anywhere near where they are spraying these chemicals need to alert their family to leave; they are the target of this false flag. To anyone who finds credence, or a shred of truth in what I've written, please pass this on; as we all are the target on the grand scale. The target by way of the coming carbon tax, cap, and trade.
God Bless,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek7ZHenQnu4&feature=player_embedded
Watch The Power of Nightmares Episode 1 Online with Other Documentary Films and Free Movies at www.freedocumentaries.org.
"'The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear' consists of three one-hour films, mostly of a montage of archive footage.
The films compare the rise of the American Neo-Conservative movement and the radical Islamist movement, making comparisons on their origins and suggesting a strong connection between the two.
More controversially, it argues that the threat of radical Islamism as a massive, sinister organized force of destruction, specifically in the form of al-Qaeda, is in fact a myth perpetrated by politicians in many countries and particularly American Neo-Conservatives in an attempt to unite and inspire their people following the failure of earlier, more utopian ideologies."
James Bamford : Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette:
"James Bamford, author of The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America, discusses the huge advances in NSA technology and invasiveness since the Church Committee‘s 1975-76 investigation of illegal intelligence gathering, the NSA’s ominously-titled “Perfect Citizen” cyber assault monitoring program, technology and free speech activists who fight internet censorship and how the major telecom hubs provide the NSA with enough information to fill enormous data centers.
MP3 here. (28:24)http://dissentradio.com/radio/10_07_26_bamford.mp3
James Bamford is the author of three books about the NSA and a former Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight. The Emmy nominated PBS Nova program “The Spy Factory” can be watched here."http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/spyfactory/program.html
Daniel Ellsberg : Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette:
"Ellsberg: That’s true; you’ve put it well. Actually I’ve had a laugh over some of the statements of the administration which take the form, “We’ve learned nothing new from these.” Well, duh. You know, surprise. These are their own reports. They’re not supposed to be seeing something new from their own reports that hopefully they’ve been reading over the years....
But when President Obama says, “Well, this has all been a matter of public discussion before” – yes, as you say, it’s been charged by Afghans that civilians were being killed; it’s been charged by President Karzai that civilians were being killed and that it was being covered-up. But that’s been accompanied by official denials that we were hitting civilians, or statements, “We are investigating,” which itself is almost surely untrue. There’s no evidence of real investigations in these many thousands of pages of documents. But what is true is that a lot of the reporting was perfectly knowledgeable that civilians were being killed and that official denials were false."
Ellsberg: In other words, we have been making life hell – literally hell – for Afghanistan, not just for two years here, not for ten years, but for thirty years. The quotes you’re talking about from Brezinski go back to 1979 and 1980, and for all that period we have been fueling conflict in Afghanistan of a kind that did not exist before the Soviets were provoked to come in. It’s a terrible, terrible thing we’ve been doing, and it’s really time to stop.
There’s a spill of blood, like the spill of oil in the gulf, that’s been beneath the surface, like the oil, for so long and one thing these reports do – which the administration, of course, has not – is to bring that flood of blood near the surface, where we can see it a little. It’s really brought it into public consciousness where I hope it really will make a difference.
"They look for comfortable lies...
This Global Warming thing is an invention of the priviledged world.
Someone is going to make a lot of money from these schemes.
...They have to pretend they are doing important research without ever criticizing powerful interest. In a real way. So what do they look for? They look for elusive sanitized things like: "Acid Rain", Global Warming..."
Subject: RE: Afghanistan war logs:
From:
Date: July 27, 2010 11:26 PM
Could also be a misdirections. Wikileaks founder says, "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." Perhaps to crackdown on Internet?
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/features/wanted-by-the-cia-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-14880073.html#
Vet the data as you would anything else from any source. Use your skills of discernment. For me, the most worrying thing about WikiLeaks is the promotion it receives from the corporate media. Even the trash talking Wired is promoting Wikileaks by constantly mentioning it.In the end, though, obsessing about disinfo this and disinfo that is generally a waste of time. It’s safe to assume that damn near everything we come across contains disinfo.There is the issue of stench, however. Sources that say, categorically, that there’s nothing to see here on 9/11 smell really bad to me. As bad as anything can smell. (See my maggot bucket if you think that I don’t know what smells bad.)
http://cryptogon.com/?p=16641
